Compare AI models: LongCat-2.0 vs Kimi K2.7 Code
- LongCat-2.0Meituan
- Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LongCat-2.0 | 24/100 | 69/100 | 39/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 29/100 |
| Kimi K2.7 Code | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 37/100 | 63/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.75/ 1M
$0.69/ 1M
Output
$3.00/ 1M
$3.29/ 1M
Cached input
$0.01/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
51K
153K
Completed sessions
538,446
591,362
Token share
0.02%
0.09%
Tokens
299B-38%
1.3T-29%
SEP 17NOV 11
SEP 17NOV 11
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
61.3%599 user-weeks
56.5%12K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeLongCat-2.0 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructLongCat-2.0·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeKimi K2.7 Code vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K2.7 Code·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonLongCat-2.0 vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.0·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonKimi K2.7 Code vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.7 Code·Jamba Mini