试用 OpenCode立即试用

Compare AI models: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs MiniMax-M2.5

Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
MiniMax-M2.5MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor	100/100	90/100	81/100	92/100	83/100	100/100
MiniMax-M2.5	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	51/100	57/100	49/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Context length

1M

205K

Reasoning

True

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio

Text

Output modalities

Text

Text

Providers

Pricing

Input

$0.10/ 1M

$0.30/ 1M

Output

$0.20/ 1M

$1.20/ 1M

Cached input

$0.002/ 1M

$0.03/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

1.2M

19K

Completed sessions

267,139,759

67,888

Token share

13.6%

0%

Tokens

190T+179%

6.4B-78%

SEP 17NOV 11

SEP 17NOV 11

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

69.2%55K user-weeks

63.3%109 user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3 ContributorDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M2.5Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.3 ContributorJamba Mini Related comparisonMiniMax-M2.5 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.5Jamba Mini