试用 OpenCode立即试用

Compare AI models: deepseek-v4p1-flash-1017-spot vs Kimi K3

  1. deepseek-v4p1-flash-1017-spotDeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Kimi K3MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
deepseek-v4p1-flash-1017-spot50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
Kimi K3100/100100/10013/10092/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
Unknown
1M
Reasoning
Unknown
True
Input modalities
Unknown
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Unknown
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$2.35/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$12/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.23/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2.5K
201K
Completed sessions
18,317
655,475
Token share
0%
0.03%
Tokens
53B+100%
458B-70%
SEP 17NOV 11
SEP 17NOV 11
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
41.3%12K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.