Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
- GLM-5.3Zhipu
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro | 100/100 | 100/100 | 39/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 68/100 |
| GLM-5.3 | 83/100 | 100/100 | 31/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 100/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.90/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Output
$2.70/ 1M
$4.18/ 1M
Cached input
$0.03/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
400K
288K
Completed sessions
1,640,422
1,118,862
Token share
0.41%
0.12%
Tokens
5.8T-76%
1.7T+46%
SEP 17NOV 11
SEP 17NOV 11
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
57.3%28K user-weeks
45.8%16K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-5.3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5.3 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.3·Jamba Mini