Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3 vs Hy4
- MiniMax-M3MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Hy4TencentHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M3 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 83/100 | 58/100 | 92/100 | 50/100 | 21/100 |
| Hy4 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 38/100 | 92/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.96/ 1M
Output
$1.19/ 1M
$2.88/ 1M
Cached input
$0.05/ 1M
$0.05/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
170K
18K
Completed sessions
1,375,047
61,968
Token share
0.15%
0.03%
Tokens
2.1T-42%
373B+100%
SEP 17NOV 11
SEP 17NOV 11
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
59%9.2K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeHy4 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy4·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonHy4 vs Jamba MiniHy4·Jamba Mini