试用 OpenCode立即试用

Compare AI models: Muse Ember vs GPT-6 Luna

  1. Muse EmberMetaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. GPT-6 LunaOpenAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Muse Ember100/1000/10072/10092/10083/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
GPT-6 Luna50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark45/10072/10098/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1.1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$0.50/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.004/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
41K
1.4M
Completed sessions
554,695
10,683,155
Token share
0.16%
0.45%
Tokens
2.2T+100%
6.2T+100%
SEP 17NOV 11
SEP 17NOV 11
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
66.7%17K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.