Compare AI models: LongCat-2.5 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- LongCat-2.5MeituanHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LongCat-2.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 57/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 17/100 | 92/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$10/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
13K
80K
Completed sessions
134,034
213,050
Token share
0.02%
0.03%
Tokens
342B+100%
472B+100%
SEP 17NOV 11
SEP 17NOV 11
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
56.6%2.6K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeLongCat-2.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructLongCat-2.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeKimi K3.1 Pro vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K3.1 Pro·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonLongCat-2.5 vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonKimi K3.1 Pro vs Jamba MiniKimi K3.1 Pro·Jamba Mini