Wypróbuj OpenCodeWypróbuj

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

  1. DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
  2. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4 Pro100/100100/10039/10081/1000/10068/100
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B0/10034/10082/10063/1000/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.90/ 1M
$0.06/ 1M
Output
$2.70/ 1M
$0.24/ 1M
Cached input
$0.03/ 1M
$0.06/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
400K
171K
Completed sessions
1,640,422
4,805,906
Token share
0.41%
0.31%
Tokens
5.8T-76%
4.3T+18%
SEP 17NOV 11
SEP 17NOV 11
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
57.3%28K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.