Спробувати OpenCodeСпробувати

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  1. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. MiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 101753/100100/10057/10081/10033/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
MiMo-V2.6-Flash29/10058/10075/10092/10067/10055/100
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.16/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$0.32/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.004/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
116K
1.2M
Completed sessions
1,381,127
40,978,816
Token share
0.3%
4.11%
Tokens
4.3T+100%
57T+100%
SEP 17NOV 11
SEP 17NOV 11
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
80.2%9.6K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.